Howdy. So, since becoming raw about a year and a half ago, I've had this idea in the back of my head that I need my typical 2000 or whatever calories per day to stay energetic and active, or at least 1000 under the undereating/longevity guidelines. But lately I've only been eating when I'm TRULY hungry (usually after exercise), primarily green juices and blended soups, and I honestly don't need much at all - a few sips of juice, a couple of spoonfulls of raw gazpacho, and I'm totally satiated because of the high nutrient content; I'm even more energized in fact, and some days I don't even need food at all. Since I've really tuned into my body and objectively listened to what IT wants (not my emotions), I've found that I can survive, excuse me - thrive BETTER, with extremely little consumption.
It's tough - on one hand raw restaurants are sprouting up everywhere, and mock sausage pizza and chocolate cake indeed sound enticing. On the other, the peace and minimal effort required to be present and mindful with a relatively empty stomach satisfy things deeper than taste and the palate. I know all of this has been said before, but, having experienced what many books have touted, it feels as though I'm learning this for the first time. I don't think "raw" is what one should focus on if aiming for optimal health; I think eating as little food as possible for one's needs is a more powerful practice, even if some is cooked. Clearly, those going through a transition from cooked to raw will eat more food. But in general, we probably don't need to eat as much as we think. Granted, I will stay 100% raw because its' so much easier to undereat when every bite has so much nutrition relative to cooked. But is a temperate cooked vegan healthier than an overeating raw fooder in the long run?
I think being raw is important, don't get me wrong, as the quality of that which one consumes on a raw diet is arguably the best on the planet in terms of food. But so many in our movement, I have observed, neglect the quantity and manner of consumption - which are equally if not MORE important aspects of eating - and I think instead of books sprouting up about macronutrient ratios of sugar/fat/protein, etc., we would be better served with books about how to get in touch with our bodies, find out what they want at any given moment, and how much they need. It will TELL you if it does well eating x, y, and z. The only way to get in touch, I've found, is to s l o w down, breathe in silence, and just engage awareness. Actually, who needs a book to learn how to do that?
I wish everyone temperate eating,
Spencer
Share
-
▶ Reply to This