Just wondering....

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Finnegan Kelley on June 14, 2009 at 3:57am

Force of habit?

If we're this finicky with food...

Or, how about:

P.S. In order to fully express my deep regret of any possible residual embarrassment I bring you this: Adorable, mind-cleansing, non-phallic cucumbers!

P.P.S. Probably not a good idea to do google image searches for cucumbers with safe search turned off.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Reetz on June 14, 2009 at 8:44am

oh my goodness, i want a tool that helps cut cucumbers like this! If there is such a thing in america, ill pay someone to send me some of these.......briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliant. :)

and i'm going to stay away from searching cucumbers on google, with or without safe search turned off...thanks for the heads up. ;)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Finnegan Kelley on June 14, 2009 at 6:59pm

I think they were grown into those shapes, put into moulds (molds?) when the plants were young looks like ^_^

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Gil on June 19, 2009 at 12:01pm

LOL...@ "if were this finicky with our food"

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Silverfire on June 14, 2009 at 5:34am

Cos we suck! Lol!

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Brian on June 14, 2009 at 7:33am

Good question! My best guess is that it is because we are so rare (or raw?:) One in fifty for high raw and maybe one in a thousand for 100% raw? Think about it. Going raw is a life changer. Would you marry a non-raw foodist? How many 100% raw or even high raw people do you personally know in your home town who are available? If you find one then, you have to consider thier other compatability attributes.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by peanut on June 14, 2009 at 9:06am

Wait, I'm confused. I'm 100% most days, and I'm marrying a non-raw guy... why is that impossible?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Brian on June 14, 2009 at 9:36am

Congratulations on your engagement and best wishes for your marriage! I did not mean to imply that it is impossible for a raw foodist to marry a SAD eater and for life to be anything less than ideal.

However, it has been my observation that many raw fooders say they would find it easier to stay raw when everyone on the household is also raw. For me, cooked food is addicting and I would have trouble if it was around the house. Also, for me there are other factors tied to going raw like better mental clarity, increased awareness, spiritual mission, synchronicities, pheromones, health, etc. Personally, I would want to share these factors with my life partner. The more you have in common, the better IMHO.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Zoe on June 14, 2009 at 9:08am

one in fifty for high raw??? Maybe where you live, more like one in a frigging million in my world ;)

Am single coz I want to be. It is more fun, no limitations, can get all the cuddles I want from friends, and sex too...don't need to put a lassoo round someone's neck, or my own. Personally I feel that the traditional notion of a relationship is outdated and really not for everyone. Especially crazy raw fooders ;0
But maybe, as my friends say to me, 'just you wait till you fall in love, then you'll change your tune !!'

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Travis on June 14, 2009 at 10:06am

maybe a coincidence? but i'm going to have to answer your question with a question:
why do so many people always need to be in a relationship?
personally it doesn't bother me one bit that i'm single and i could stay that way forever and not
be fussed.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Carol on June 14, 2009 at 11:18am

Can be???!!! It is!

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Carol on June 14, 2009 at 11:17am

No reassessment needed, i am extremely happy with all things in my life. For me, all my doors are wide open, it seems other people that i meet have their doors closed!! i was just noticing while reading people's profiles that so many of us are unattached and like you said, hot and attractive. Wondering what the deal was and though i'd put it out there to see what others thought too.

▶ Reply to This

• 1
• 2
• 3