Cancer.. Cancer.. Cancer... The Crying Shame.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Burke Bryant on June 26, 2009 at 4:01pm

Mellifera,
If you know so much about cancer, why are you then being so intentionally facetious to the people on this thread?
It's the oxygen in the Sodium Bicarbonate (NaHCO3.) that kills the cancer, fungus, pathogen, etc. SB is an extremely simply compound, I'm not a doctor but half the people I know are, and I, as well as them, hardly think that this simple compound has the potential to kill anyone. People wash there mouths with it, do enemas with it, drink it to relieve gas, etc.

Other than that the "Quack" as you put it, is doing more in regards to medical research than most I know, and his success rate regarding CURE is light years beyond chemo, radiation or any other FDA approved drug.

The information you pulled on him, and some of the wording such as "Quakery" which you also lifted from the site (http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=473) is just an argument. As a matter of fact Simoncini claims he never even treated the woman that died. The Dr. that is making the argument goes on to say that the "Quack" even claims that cancer is due to excess acidity in the body. Well he's right there, the body has to be over acidic to even get sick! And your source laughs at that, and for good reason I suppose, a simple, homeopathic solution to sickness and diease is no money in his pocket.

Please stop the cynacism and join into this thread as a happy person.

Respectfully,
Burke Bryant

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Mellifera on June 26, 2009 at 4:39pm

You really do believe that all science is a conspiracy against the truth? I don't see what is happy or positive about that. I think that there is corruption out there, but I also feel sad that people forgo proven treatments in favor of baking soda. Baking soda isn't killing anyone...not getting real treatment is.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Burke Bryant on June 26, 2009 at 5:12pm

You said "You really do believe that all science is a conspiracy against the truth? "
No I don't, where have I stated that at? I do however, know with certainty, that corporate profits are more important that anyones health.

What is a "proven" treatment? I mean... why has everything turned into a treatment opposed to a cure? Corporate profits?

So, no I don't think science is a conspiracy at all, and if you knew my background you would laugh at any statement claiming otherwise ;) and I will be the first to say I think disease is in fact necessary to control our ever over expanding population, especially when the Gov. can't control 14 year olds from pushing out 2-3 kids before adulthood, but what I am against is being lied to so someone can make a profit from it... Hmmm wait, I suppose the Gov. has to go with the common denominator, which would be the sheep mentality, so perhaps lying is the best way to approach this situation....

In closing, death was a pretty fun and enlightning thing for me, if the day ever comes that I need "treatment" I will happily decline. ;)

-Burke

P.S and Melli, please know that your information is always appreciated. I have learned a great deal from many of your posts. ;)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Niki infinity on June 26, 2009 at 6:31pm

Dr Hulda Clarks' book"The Cure For All Cancers" addresses this same data about acid condition created by Environmental,diet and mind conditions leading to a degradation by fungus and other parasites, plant and animal such as worms-this is a cycle of cancer as well as many other deseases that are part of the recycling of life. I believe it's programmed into DNA,as stated by Carl Zimmer in "Parasite Rex" his text book used in Colleges.These parasites purpose is to dissentigrate decayed matter,maybe? Ah so, if this has any validity then of course Baking Soda,chemicals and electronic radiation has some effect.But I feel the knowledge of the causes of the conditions and desire to live healthy can lead one to an alkaline diet and positive people which averts this decay, at least it has in my experience. Dr.Robert Cassar has a program for an alkaline body to flush out parasites and build a strong happy body. Youtube .com videos galore on this. Thought determines Function and that determines structure. Heres to infinite awareness for us all,don't stop till you get enough. Love NikiI

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Lightlover on June 26, 2009 at 6:48pm

"You really do believe that all science is a conspiracy against the truth?"

No, I think there are sincerely innocent people who do research and realy believe they are

doing a good job. I only say that within the current system, they will never be

allowed to bring to the world something healing...It will all be about managing the illness.

So yes, it is for many people a well paid job, to run in never ending circles, BTW Dutch

specialist are the best paid in the world (average: 250.000 EURO's..), there is huge money

to defend. Healing with cheap natural medicine is a disaster for the status and economy

of these people.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Rawzilla on June 26, 2009 at 6:54pm

For my part, I just want to clarify a few things. When I mentioned 811 as possibly having a role in candidiasis, I didn't mean because fruit is moldy (some tend to be, as multisport said, such as dates and grapes) or to imply that fruit is not healthful. It absolutely is, and I do eat fruit for both enjoyment and my health. But sugars feed yeast, and a diet high in fruit, particularly sweet fruits, and not too much else would contribute to it, in my opinion and experience. That's my understanding. Also, I got sick from eating all that fruit, so it is currently my belief something is wrong with too much of it.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Rawzilla on June 26, 2009 at 7:00pm

Sorry, this reply is long, but this is the kind of information I love to collect, and others might want to grab it too.

As far as science and corruption goes, there is no question that science and medicine have been heavily compromised by the big industries and by government agendas. I have been researching it for a long time. Even the Union for Concerned Scientists state, “Political interference in federal government science is weakening our nation's ability to respond to the complex challenges we face.”

That interference affects the environment, science, public health, and medicine.

I think most scientists and doctors are unaware of or at least unhappy about what is going on, but I know for a fact that some of them knowingly participate in the lies, because they make a lot of money from it.

Pharmacies now fund med schools and design the med school classes. Classes are free for doctors who take the classes that are designed to promote the pharmaceuticals, but they pay extra for courses on nutrition: http://www.jsonline.com/news/42064977.html

Add to this the fact that the drug companies manipulate the studies. Here is an article that talks about how scientific studies are tainted to favor the drug companies:
http://www.livescience.com/health/090511-medical-studies-conflict.html

The attached Committe on Gov. Reform report reveals major conflicts of for an entire panel that approved an unsafe vaccine, including one doctor who had a $9 million contract for the vaccine whose safety and approval she was supposed to weigh in on, free from any conflicts of interest. The report concludes that the vaccine safety and approval industry is dominated by vaccine manufacturers and is "out of control."

The attached report disappeared shortly from the web after it was published. Doctors who spoke out against vaccines over the years were thrown out of the medical community (e.g., Wakefield).

"Deadly Immunity," published in Rolling Stone, reveals how a secret meeting was held to deal with (make disappear) the inconvenient fact that “vaccines—thimerosal—appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and a host of other neurological disorders among children.”

These were “top government scientists and health officials.”
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7395411/deadly_immunity/

The CDC paid the Institute of Medicine to conduct a study to whitewash the risks of thimerosal, ordering researchers to "rule out" the chemical's link to autism. The IOM wrote all about how there is no correlation between vaccines and autism—I read that nonsense.

But we still not have heard any of this in the mainstream media, nor will most physicians talk about it—if they even know.

Concerning both the environment and public health, the attached "Politics and Science and the Bush Administration" reveals how the Bush Administration, “repeatedly suppressed, distorted, or obstructed science to suit political and ideological goals.” It goes on to imply that any President always has some influence on scientific integrity, but this administration just went too far.

It is quite a read. When I first read it, I was completely unaware of any kind of “conspiracy theories.” I was so shocked, and it paved the way for the rest of my quest to find out the truth, especially as it related to my own healing.

I have even contacted the CDC on some of their unsupported claims regarding the supposed 3,600 deaths from the flu (their own MMWR report showed around 200) and the efficacy of the flu vaccines (at the time, the CDC website said it was the best way to prevent getting the flu, but again their own studies showed otherwise), and they assured me they would dig up those studies to support their claims, but they never returned my calls and emails.

I don't believe that all science is a conspiracy against the truth. But I believe that the field has been largely corrupted by big industry and government agendas.

Attachments:

• Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy Making.pdf, 127 KB
• politicssciencebushadminstration.pdf, 668 KB

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Erin on June 26, 2009 at 8:40pm

I remember reading a few years ago that the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine himself admitted that they weren't publishing studies that weren't funded by drug companies. His lame excuse was that they couldn't find independent studies to publish. Right.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Rawzilla on June 26, 2009 at 8:47pm

Erin, I just had to find that one. Thank you--it's a gem.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20020805/newman20020725

"This announcement by the New England Journal of Medicine is just the tip of the iceberg of a scientific establishment that has been pervasively corrupted by conflicts of interest and bias, throwing doubt on almost all scientific claims made in the biomedical field."

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Erin on June 26, 2009 at 9:51pm

And to make things worse, the way study results are interpreted are so skewed and then the media eff's it up even more when they report the findings!
Here's a great example of a flawed study that happened to be funded by a pharma company. I remember when this one made headlines:
http://www.vrp.com/articles.aspx?ProdID=art529&zTYPE=2

Permalink Reply by Lightlover on July 1, 2009 at 5:40pm

Brookemelanie, I don't know how it is in Australia, but as long as a patient hasn't got the possibility

to choose EXCLUSIVELY for "alternative therapies" for cancer treatment, instead of chemo

or chemo/alternative combi, there is still no healthfreedom at all.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Lisa San Souci on June 26, 2009 at 6:08pm

Couldn't agree with you more.

▶ Reply to This

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last